Shared care versus hospital-based cardiac rehabilitation: a cost-utility analysis based on a randomised controlled trial

Jannik B Bertelsen; Nasrin Tayyari Dehbarez; Jens Refsgaard; Helle Kanstrup; Søren P. Johnsen; Ina Qvist; Bo Christensen; Rikke Søgaard; Kent L. Christensen
Changes in the organisation of chronic healthcare, an increased awareness of costs and challenges of low adherence in cardiac rehabilitation (CR) call for the exploration of more flexible CR programmes as alternatives to hospital-based CR (H-CR). A model of shared care cardiac rehabilitation (SC-CR) that included general practitioners and the municipality was developed. The aim of this study was to analyse the cost utility of SC-CR versus H-CR. The cost-utility analysis was based on a randomised controlled trial of 212 patients who were allocated to SC-CR or H-CR and followed up for 12 months. A societal cost perspective was applied that included the cost of intervention, informal time, healthcare and productivity loss. Costing was based on a microcosting approach for the intervention and on national administrative registries for the other cost categories. Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were based on the EuroQol 5-Dimensions measurements at baseline, after 4 months and after 12 months. Conventional cost-effectiveness methodology was employed to estimate the net benefit of SC-CR.

Link til ekstern hjemmeside

Udgivelsesform Videnskabelige artikler
År 2018